☰ Contents · Uzbek language

The object; texts of Navoiy and Aesop

Lessons 53–54 · 2 lessons · M. Qodirov, H. Ne’matov, M. Abduraimova, R. Sayfullayeva, B. Mengliyev. Ona tili (Uzbek language), Grade 8, 4th edition. Cho‘lpon Publishing and Printing Creative House, Tashkent, 2019
54

Working with a classical text and dictionaries

Textbook: p. 85
GoalAn extract from Navoiy’s Muhokamat ul-lug‘atayn and an Aesop fable; replacing objects with synonyms.
New words
Debate of Two Languages · Muhokamat ul-lug‘ataynequivalent · muqobilthe area between eye and brow · qabog‘fable · masal
Explanation

In Muhokamat ul-lug‘atayn (“Debate of the Two Languages”, 1499) Alisher Navoiy compares Turkic and Persian and shows the richness of Turkic. In the extract the author discusses the Persian equivalents of the Turkic words “yasanmoq” and “bezanmoq”, and says that “qabog‘”, the word for the area between eye and brow, has no Persian name. Navoiy supports his point with a couplet quoted from a “Masnaviy”. The second text is Aesop’s fable “The Fox and the Woodcutter”: the woodcutter hides the fox and tells the hunters “I did not see”, but points with his hand to the hiding place; the fox, because word and deed did not match, shows no gratitude. The moral: let your word agree with your deed.

Worked examples
Replacing objects: “nutq” → “so‘z”, “tavsif” → “ta’rif”.
Objects from the fable: tulkini (direct), ovchilardan (indirect), qo‘li bilan (indirect).
Class activity

Staging the fable: three pupils (fox, woodcutter, hunter) act it out briefly; the class draws the moral.

Practice
1
What does Navoiy prove in Muhokamat ul-lug‘atayn?
2
What does Navoiy say about the word “qabog‘”?
3
In what did the woodcutter go wrong in the fable?
4
Write your conclusion from the fable in two sentences.