8
Global warming (B)
Textbook: pp. 38–41
GoalComparing all three conditionals; solutions to global warming; preparing for a vocabulary quiz.
New words
solar energy · quyosh energiyasishortage · kamchilik, yetishmovchilikremedy · yechim, davorescue · asrab qolmoq, qutqarmoq
Explanation
Compare the three conditionals. First: If we use solar energy, we will cut costs (real future). Second: If we used solar energy everywhere, we would cut emissions a lot (imaginary present or future). Third: If we had used solar energy earlier, we would have cut emissions already (imaginary past). When describing solutions you can mix should, could and would: We should plant trees; this could slow the heating. An essay follows the pattern problem – cause – solution – conclusion, and each part can include one or two conditional sentences.
Worked examples
If cities had built more cycle lanes, fewer people would have driven to work.
If everyone saved a little energy, the total demand would fall.
Class activity
Vocabulary quiz: teams guess global warming words from definitions (a gas that traps heat; the cutting down of forests...). The team with most correct answers wins.
Practice
1
Choose the type: “If the ice melts, the sea level will rise.”
first conditional
2
Complete the third conditional: If people ___ (save) more water last summer, there ___ (be) no shortage.
had saved; would have been
3
Write a second conditional with solar energy.
For example: If every school had solar panels, it would save a lot of money.
4
Why can’t we use the third conditional to talk about tomorrow?
Because it describes the past, which is finished; tomorrow needs the first or second conditional.