☰ Contents · History of Uzbekistan

Cultural life and historical sources of the Khiva Khanate

Lessons 28–29 · 2 lessons · U. Jo‘rayev, Q. Usmonov, G. Jo‘rayeva, N. Norqulov. O‘zbekiston tarixi (History of Uzbekistan, 16th to mid-19th century), Grade 8. O‘qituvchi, Tashkent, 2019 (revised and expanded 4th edition)
29

Sources on the history of the Khiva Khanate

Textbook: pp. 106–109
GoalExplain the types of sources on Khiva Khanate history and their importance.
New words
historical source · manbaarchive documents · arxiv hujjatlarimemoir · esdalikorientalist · sharqshunos
Explanation

To study history one first uses documents, then works by local and foreign authors. The documents of the Khiva khan’s chancery were taken to St Petersburg in 1873 after Russia conquered the khanate and were returned to Tashkent in 1962; they provide information on government, taxes, money, administration and trade. Local works include Abulghazi’s “Shajara-i Turk”, Munis’s “Firdavs ul-iqbal”, Agahi’s historical works and Khudoyberdi Avaz Muhammad’s “Dil-i garoyib”, written in 1831–1832. Records left by Russian envoys are also important: I. Khokhlov (1620–1622), N. Muravyov (1819), G. Danilevsky and R. Basiner (1842) and N. Ignatyev (1858); they give political and economic information but were often gathered to serve their own country’s interests. Among European travellers the works of A. Jenkinson (16th century) and the Hungarian scholar A. Vámbéry (19th century) are valuable; Uzbek scholars have created studies such as the “History of Khwarazm from Ancient Times to the Present” (1976). Each source must be read with the author’s position and purpose in mind.

Worked examples
The archive’s route: 1873 to St Petersburg → 1962 to Tashkent — 89 years.
Source types: document, local work, envoy’s memoir, traveller’s account, modern study.
Class activity

“Source analysis”: choose one source and answer three questions: who wrote it, when and why.

Practice
1
When were the Khiva khan’s archive documents taken to St Petersburg and when were they returned?
2
How many years were the documents away? (1873–1962)
3
What should one keep in mind when using Russian envoys’ records?
4
What is the benefit of comparing local and foreign sources?