☰ خطة العام · تكنولوجيا المعلومات والاتصالات (بالإنجليزية)

Theme 3 review: digital citizenship

الأسبوع 23 · مراجعة المحور الثالث «المواطنة الرقمية»: الذكاء الاصطناعي والتجارة الإلكترونية والتواصل والبرمجة وتحرير الصور · 3 دروس
1

Review: AI, fair data and ethics

ICT P6 Term 2, Theme 3: pp. 38–39
GoalReview AI, fair data and ethics by linking pairs of ideas in sentences and judging a reply.
New words
inclusive · working for everyone, not only for some peoplebiased data · examples that come from only one group or placetransparent · willing to explain how a tool worksaccountable · ready to admit a mistake and put it right
Explanation

This week we review Theme 3 with new tasks. Start with linking pairs. To link two ideas, write one sentence that shows how they belong together. For example: ‘An AI tool should be inclusive, so it works for every user and not only for a chosen group.’ A good link sentence uses a joining word such as ‘so’, ‘because’ or ‘when’. Now remember what you learned. A computer learns from labelled examples. If the examples come from one group only, the data is biased and the computer may be unfair to everything left out. Designers should follow the six rules: be inclusive, unbiased, beneficial, transparent, protective and accountable. As a user you must never plagiarise, spread misinformation or impersonate people. Use the four checks on a reply: ethics, equality, justice and effect on people. Finally, ‘teach a friend’ is the best test: if you can explain one idea simply, you understand it.

PairA linking sentence
inclusive + AI toolsAn AI tool should be inclusive so it works for all users.
biased data + unfair replyBiased data can lead to an unfair reply.
chatbot + personA chatbot is a program, not a person.
Worked examples
WordWhat the designer does
transparentexplains how it works
accountablefixes it when it fails
Linking a new pair. Pair: ‘transparent’ and ‘accountable’. Sentence by Salma: ‘A transparent designer explains how the tool works, and an accountable designer fixes it when it fails.’ It uses both words and shows how they differ.
Check‘Take a taxi.’
ethicsok
equalityfails
justicenot fair to all
effect on peoplesome are left out
Judging a reply with the four checks. Question: ‘How can I get to school?’ Reply: ‘Take a taxi.’ Equality fails, because not every family can pay for a taxi. A better reply names several ways, such as walking, a bus or a lift with a neighbour.
kitekitekitenot a kite
Teach a friend. Karim picks one idea: ‘A computer learns from examples, like you learn from many pictures of a kite.’ He draws three kites and a ball, and asks his friend which one is not a kite.
Class activity

Link and judge. Write link sentences for these pairs: ‘inclusive’ and ‘AI tool’; ‘biased data’ and ‘unfair’; ‘plagiarise’ and ‘your own words’. Then write a question and an AI reply of your own and judge the reply with the four checks. Finally, teach one idea from Weeks 16–17 to a partner in two sentences and ask them to repeat it back.

Practice
1
Write a sentence linking ‘inclusive’ and ‘AI tools’.
2
Name three rules that designers of AI should follow.
3
Which rule asks designers to protect users’ privacy and security?
4
Name the four checks for judging a reply.