☰ Contents · History of Uzbekistan

The cotton affair and its consequences

Lessons 26 · 1 lessons · Q. Rajabov, A. Zamonov. History of Uzbekistan (1917–1991): textbook for Grade 10 of secondary schools and for students of secondary specialised and vocational institutions. 1st edition. G‘afur G‘ulom Publishing-Printing Creative House, Tashkent, 2017
26

The “cotton affair” in Uzbekistan and its consequences

Textbook: pp. 128–131
GoalDescribe the start, course and consequences of the “cotton affair”, separating the textbook’s data from the disputed aspects.
New words
the “cotton affair”: a campaign of investigations in the 1980s · paxta ishipadding: reporting output that does not exist · qo‘shib yozish“landing-party” official sent from Moscow · desantchipre-trial detention centre · tergov izolyatori
Explanation

Leonid Brezhnev died in November 1982, Yuri Andropov led in 1982–1984 and Konstantin Chernenko in 1984–1985, and on 11 March 1985 Mikhail Gorbachev was elected General Secretary of the CPSU. In Uzbekistan Sharof Rashidov died in October 1983; Inomjon Usmonxo‘jayev led the republic in 1983–1988 and Rafiq Nishonov in 1988–1989. In April 1983 an investigators’ group led by Telman Gdlyan and Nikolay Ivanov was formed under the USSR Prosecutor General; on 23 June 1984 a plenum of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Uzbekistan took up padding of cotton reports and bribery. According to the textbook, in 1983–1987 about 1,000 “landing-party” officials from Moscow, Leningrad and other cities were sent to leading posts, in 1985–1990 40,000 people were investigated and 5,000 prosecuted, and many spent long periods in pre-trial detention. The textbook assesses the affair as a political campaign and an “Uzbek case”, while admitting that padding and bribery existed in many parts of the Union; historians debate the methods used, the validity of the charges and the scale. Rashidov’s name was criticised after his death, and in later years many verdicts were reviewed.

Worked examples
Example (calculation): 40,000 people were investigated and 5,000 prosecuted (textbook figures): 40,000 − 5,000 = 35,000 were not prosecuted.
Example (approach to sources): for figures such as “many thousands” one should ask which document they rest on, comparing prosecution, defence and later review documents.
Class activity

Role discussion: one group presents the textbook view and another the historians’ debate; both sides give evidence.

Practice
1
When was the Gdlyan–Ivanov investigators’ group formed?
2
When was the plenum of the Central Committee held?
3
According to the textbook, of 40,000 investigated, how many were not prosecuted (5,000 were)?
4
Why is a one-sided conclusion about the “cotton affair” risky?